Comments on: dot.Com vs. dot.ORG http://www.pinoyinternetbusiness.com/299/dot-com-vs-dot-org/ Practical and Helpful Advice for Filipino Internet Marketers Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:16:15 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: MannyV http://www.pinoyinternetbusiness.com/299/dot-com-vs-dot-org/comment-page-1/#comment-107 MannyV Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:46:01 +0000 http://www.pinoyinternetbusiness.com/?p=299#comment-107 For easier audience recall, choose dotCOM. For SEO purposes, dotORG will do (if the dotCOM version has already been taken). For branding, however, don't promote a dotORG site unless you want to help the owner of the dotCOM version free website traffic. :-) For easier audience recall, choose dotCOM. For SEO purposes, dotORG will do (if the dotCOM version has already been taken).

For branding, however, don’t promote a dotORG site unless you want to help the owner of the dotCOM version free website traffic. :-)

]]> By: Bernie Joseph http://www.pinoyinternetbusiness.com/299/dot-com-vs-dot-org/comment-page-1/#comment-102 Bernie Joseph Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:48:00 +0000 http://www.pinoyinternetbusiness.com/?p=299#comment-102 Conditional Comment v.s. Meta Tag Hi! It seems that it is now a Micro$oft standard, that is, giving us IE-generated headaches, every time a new version comes out. Speaking of IE8 compatibility issues, when is one used over the other? The conditional comment: <!--[if IE 8] >--> - v.s. - The meta tag: Thanks. Conditional Comment v.s. Meta Tag

Hi!

It seems that it is now a Micro$oft standard, that is, giving us IE-generated headaches, every time a new version comes out.

Speaking of IE8 compatibility issues, when is one used over the other?

The conditional comment:

– v.s. -

The meta tag:

Thanks.

]]>